Small-cap or large-cap funds: Where should investors put fresh money?

Where should investors put fresh money?

After several years of strong performance by mid- and small-cap stocks, large-cap funds are beginning to look more attractive for investors putting fresh money to work, according to DSP Mutual Fund’s latest Netra report.

The report highlights a sharp gap between the two segments. Small- and mid-cap stocks have significantly outperformed large caps in the current cycle. Historically, however, such periods of strong outperformance have not lasted indefinitely. During market downturns, small- and mid-caps have tended to give back much of the additional gains they made during bull markets. The report therefore argues that investors should focus on the margin of safety, rather than chase recent returns.

Valuations also favour large caps at the moment. The Nifty 50 was trading at a trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 19.26 times at the end of September, below its long-term median of 20.9 times. Its price-to-book (P/B) ratio stood at 2.75 times, compared with a historical median of 3.5 times. The report describes large-cap valuations as “fair/cheap”.

The picture is different for mid- and small-cap stocks. The Nifty Midcap 150 was trading at 27.6 times P/E and 4.11 times P/B, while the Nifty Smallcap 250 was at 33 times P/E and 3.4 times P/B. The report describes small-cap valuations as “still stretched”.

This does not mean investors should exit small- or mid-cap funds. Rather, the report suggests being more selective. For investors already holding these funds, the recent rally may have increased their exposure to these segments, making portfolio rebalancing worth considering.

Also read: Sensex, Nifty in correction mode: Should you stay invested, increase SIPs or wait for the bottom?

For those investing fresh money, “large caps may offer a better risk-reward trade-off than chasing stocks that have already delivered strong returns,” stated the report. For small- and mid-cap exposure, investors may be better served by continuing through the SIP route rather than making a large lump-sum allocation based on recent performance.

Disclaimer: The views and investment tips expressed by experts on Moneycontrol.com are their own and not those of the website or its management. Moneycontrol.com advises users to check with certified experts before taking any investment decisions.

Tags: , , ,
Why South African brands must put real sustainability above greenwashing

Why South African brands must put real sustainability above greenwashing

Ahead of Earth Day in April, Dr Stephan Helary, the founder of organic skincare brand Terres d’Afrique, presents a practical approach to sustainability for South African beauty and wellness brands.

Image supplied.

As sustainability becomes a central focus in the global beauty and wellness industry, so too has the rise of greenwashing, where brands overstate or misrepresent their environmental credentials.

For South African companies operating in an increasingly global marketplace, the challenge is to move beyond marketing claims and approach sustainability with transparency and accountability.

Honesty is the starting point.

Greenwashing is becoming more and more controlled in Europe because of strict regulations on what you can and cannot say or have on your packaging.

South African laws need to catch up, but enforcement is also important.

For brands, this means ensuring that sustainability claims are accurate and aligned with the realities of their production processes.

Language around eco-friendly or sustainable practices must be used carefully.

You can’t call yourself an eco-friendly or sustainable brand when you use plastic packaging or non-biodegradable ingredients.

Even if your plastic packaging is recycled plastic, it remains plastic with the problems that go with it in terms of the environment and public health.

Rather than striving for perfection, brands should focus on reducing their environmental footprint and being transparent about their progress.

Why clean beauty brands must move beyond aesthetics and embrace true sustainability

  2 Mar 2026

No brand can be 100% recyclable, sustainable, or eco-friendly.

You inevitably leave a footprint, but you can do the best you can as a business, based on your capabilities and financial means, to minimise that footprint.

Education also plays an important role.

Brands have a responsibility to help consumers understand sustainability so they can make informed decisions.

As a brand, you also have the obligation to inform and educate your customers so they can make an informed choice.

The future of sustainable beauty lies not in bold claims but in measurable action.

Businesses are bound to leave a footprint.

But that footprint can be minimised and even compensated for through regenerative practices.

The key is to always be transparent about what you are doing and what you are not.

Tags: , , , , , ,
Best oLive
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.